Mama (2013)

JANUARY 15, 2013

GENRE: SUPERNATURAL
SOURCE: THEATRICAL (PRESS SCREENING)

Someday, maybe for a Collins Crypt article, I'll put together a list of all the modern horror movies that star an acclaimed actress who usually doesn't do these sort of movies, usually right after winning a big award or nomination. Halle Berry in Gothika, Renee Zellweger for Case 39, etc... it's pretty common, and now it's Jessica Chastain's turn with Mama, coming out a few days after her 2nd Oscar nomination (and a Golden Globe win).

Luckily she fares better than her peers; this is a pretty solid supernatural chiller, with a number of great little creep out moments and a couple of solid jump scares to boot. The plot of the film concerns a pair of feral children who are sent to live with their uncle and his girlfriend (Chastain), and the title refers to their ghostly guardian that seemingly kept them alive in the woods until they were found (even the car they were in was never discovered, somehow - it couldn't have gone too far off the road or else they would have been killed, right?). Thankfully, the movie doesn't waste any time letting us know that Mama is real, and the movie's best scares involve our realization that she is closer than we originally thought. For example, you see the younger sister playing tug of war with a blanket, with her opponent out of frame. You're supposed to think it's her older sister, but then the other girl comes out of a room down the hall on the other side of the frame. There are a couple of these, and even when I was a bit ahead of the reveal, it didn't make them any less unnerving and delightfully creepy each time.

It's also a decent enough tale, and Guillermo Del Toro's fingerprints are evident throughout - Mama's a protective monster, a child's imagination is more powerful than we give them credit for, etc. The screenplay gets a bit clunky, however - there are THREE scenes of characters driving along a lonely road looking at a map, trying to find the cabin where the girls lived for five years, and one character's trip to a hospital has some very wonky timing built into it (they're practically dead but seemingly get out a week later). There are also odd bits of character that seem left over from earlier drafts, like the fact that the uncle and the girl's father are twin brothers - it has no payoff at all. It's also unclear why their father was driving out to the middle of nowhere in the first place - we learn (sort of) that he took a hit in the big stock crash of 2008, but also that he killed a coworker at the office and the wife at the home - why kidnap the girls when he planned to kill them as well?

But it all still works, thanks to Chastain's enjoyable turn as the punked out and unwilling mother figure (when we first meet her she is celebrating that a pregnancy test has turned up negative). Her wonderful red hair is replaced with black dye and a pixie cut, and her wardrobe consists exclusively of band T-shirts - she's next to unrecognizable, and kudos to her for going all out with the design (tattoos, too!). The girls are also quite good; one of them is almost completely feral (the other was old enough to speak at the time of the accident, so she retains basic social skills) and thus spends most of her time crawling on all fours, eating bugs and hair, etc - it's a pretty great showcase for the young actress.

As for Mama herself... SIGH. It's a great design, and largely practical, but that just makes the plastic-y CGIness of its execution in a few shots stick out, which really drove me up a wall. Obviously a human being can't turn into a pile of hair and smoke and slide along the floor, butthere are at least 3 scares that probably would have worked like gangbusters - and could have been done all practically I believe - if she wasn't resembling something I was supposed to shoot in an early PS2 game. It's especially troubling when it's a PG-13 horror and thus not particularly violent or gruesome - the ONE thing bringing in the horror element should be executed perfectly. I suspect a lot of people will compare it to early/mid 00s CGI-fests like Darkness Falls and The Grudge, and it's a shame, because it's never that bad, but when it's "off"... man oh man.

Back to the rating, I'm actually kind of surprised it got away with a PG-13, being that it's pretty intense (the MPAA has given Rs to other films for similar "too scary!" reasons, including fellow Del Toro production Don't Be Afraid of the Dark) and even has an F-bomb working against them. Plus (SPOILER!!!) the ending isn't a completely happy one, which would usually be another thing to tip the scales into R territory. Speaking of which, I laud the filmmakers for not chickening out - there's a VERY easy way of keeping things happy (it involves a branch) but they don't do it - I was legitimately surprised and impressed that they stuck to their guns.

With TCM3D turning out such a mess (an enjoyable one, to be fair) and Haunted House being atrocious (and I don't have too much hope for Hansel & Gretel), Mama is the best bet for genre fans right now. It's the only one to take the genre seriously, for starters, and while imperfect to be sure, defies enough expectations for a "PG-13 horror" (and a Jessica Chastain movie!) to warrant my respect. Great score, too!

What say you?


6 comments:

  1. I saw this last night and was totally disappointed. I played along for the first 2/3 of the flick but the ending wrecked it. they couldn't find the car, really? And the doctor's death was so predictable. And the aunt, what was that about? The last third wiped out any good will that it had built up to that point.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I actually loved the movie, other than the appearance of Mama. That was pretty dissappointing. But I thought they did find the car. When the 2 investigators were out, and one was peeing by a tree he saw the wrecked car. Then they walked past the car for a while and found the cabin.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I mean in the five years between it. If his company's troubles made the news, surely he'd be important enough to search for thoroughly in the days after his disappearance.

      Delete
  3. I didn't gather he planned to kill his daughters initially. He killed his co-worker and his wife and in panic hit the road with his daughters not knowing where he was going or what to do.

    After the crash and more internal struggle he decides to end his life (he puts the gun to his head), but then goes back out to his daughters. Perhaps in a want to kill them quickly instead of letting them suffer a slow death in the woods in an abandoned cabin. He was hardly thinking rationally at that point.

    As for not finding the car so soon, who knew where he went or that the car went off the side of a road on a mountain? It does beg the question why the trackers eventually searched that area, but the movie stays, probably intentionally so, vague on the subject.

    Also, I think the uncle being a twin was to facilitate the idea of Victoria, the older daughter, making a quick connection to Lucas. I think that was the uncle's name. That was the only point of him being a twin, to have Victoria quickly attach herself to the uncle after five-years of abandonment. Admittedly, the movie is soft on the idea and tries to sell it on one scene at the hospital after Lucas gives Victoria new glasses.

    Overall, I enjoyed the movie, but like you found some of the writing clunky and definitely some poor CGI at the end. I think I'll still recommend it to friends though.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Maybe someone could help clarify a few things in the movie that didn't make sense to me:

    1. Why didn't Mama kill the 2 guys who found the girls (wouldn't she view them as threats to the girls?)

    2. Shouldn't the maternal aunt (Jean) have equal custody rights to the kids (if not more) since Lucas is broke, not married, no job etc?

    3. ++ [spoiler] ++ Why didn't Mama try to kill the girls (by taking them down the cliff like she did at the end of the movie) the entire 5 years she had them before the girls were discovered?

    ReplyDelete
  5. About her being CG in every shot - just found out they actually used a really skinny guy called Javier Botet for some shots. Shame her face was always CG though.

    ReplyDelete

Movie & TV Show Preview Widget

Google