Halloween II: Director's Cut Differences

As before, I have compiled a list of the differences (or at least, the ones that I noticed) between the theatrical and DVD director's cut versions of a Rob Zombie Halloween movie, in this case, his even more polarizing sequel. Check it out HERE and let me know if you notice any other changes!!! (And, obviously, SPOILERS)

HorrorBlips: vote it up!

5 comments:

  1. Really? You liked part 2 better? I fuckin' hated it. I walked out after like 40 minutes. Went to see UP instead. Good movie.

    ReplyDelete
  2. 2 was fantastic! If you walked out of this I don't know what you were hoping for.

    ReplyDelete
  3. HALLOWEEN II WAS FUCKING AMAZING!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  4. totally fucking awesome! i watched all the originals and i.... didn't care much for the original 2 Halloween's.. too much screaming, 0 blood, too much drama, not enough of either killing or action.. also heh love Dr. Loomis much better in these films.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Rob zombies halloween 2 was trash. Im a huge halloween fan,i was introduced to it in 2005 , my sisters bf showed me the first 70s one. Halloween was not just a crappy slasher flick, it was creepy bcs micheal stalked jamie curtis. Rob zombies halloween was great. So i was excited for 2, i watched it, and was stupified. The story is like a 13 wrote it, angry teenager,stupid white horse premise,u see michaels face! Rob zombie screwed it up, and i hate how he puts his wife in everything, shes a horrible actor and obnoxious! He could of done something amazing, but he didnt. Rob zombie made good music ages ago, made like 2 good movies, but the excessive cussing gets old,and obnoxious. And i love cussing. Halloween one and devils rejects was badass. Halloween 2 tries to be different but its boring, the white horse theme sucks.

    ReplyDelete